Posts

Showing posts from March, 2026

Template Thinking: The ever narrowing border of human reason

Image
'Enlightnement is man's release from his self-incurred tutelage. Tutelage is man's inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another. Self-incurred is this tutelage when its cause lies not in lack of reason but in lack of resolution and courage to use it without direction from another. Sapere Aude! 'Have courage to use your own reason!' - that is the motto of the enlightenment. - Immanuel Kant in 'What is the enlightenment'  Kant, who Rudolf  Steiner described as 'the guardian of the threshold', is not one among the philosophers of ancient thought, and reducing him to the same is a grievous error. While we might analyse a number of philosophers up to Descartes, and perhaps even Leibniz as corollaries for ancient wisdom, for a Nyaya-type or a Madhyamika-type philosopher, Kant, and all of Kant, and not just the COPR, are in my reading of modern times the last stand against the darkness of human thought.  But we have forgotten Ka...

The Unseeing Gaze II: Can an LLM make a judgement of Beauty?

Image
Between the Critique of Pure Reason and the Critique of Judgement Kant produces at least two senses of the term judgement, on the one hand a system of reason that through a kind of grammar, produces the world in relation the self-conciousness or in Kant's terms the unity of apperception and on the other we have judgement from the first half of COJ, referring to Aesthetic Judgement.  Beauty as a popular idea has it, is based on symmetry, proportionality etc. However Kant's question to this judgement would be, what kind of systems of values are the values 'symmetry' and 'proportionality considered beautiful. Is it a system where the utilitarian is judged in majoritarian terms, that is the larger part of mankind agrees on it, rather than being judged by something inherent in the value itself, a virtue.  In any case of late a sufficient amount of ink has been spilt on arguing that forms of the modern internet, through mega corporations have prdoduced a kind of centraliz...

The Unseeing Gaze I: What kind of 'person' is an LLM?

Image
“ Suppose you came as an explorer into an unknown country with a language quite strange to you. In what circumstances would you say that the people there gave orders, understood them, obeyed them, rebelled against them, and so on? The common behaviour of mankind is the system of reference by means of which we interpret an unknown language. ” "An LLM is not a Subject" Of late I have out of curiosity, been involved in learning about how prompting trains Large Language Models that we use. Having worked in the sector and completed a course on the matter, and also having gone over in some detail documents pertaining to how AI companies see their models, I arrived at a question that I find of some importance in the field.  The question of whether AI has what we in common terms might call 'subjectivity' and if so of what kind has been baffling Mechanisitic Interpretability operators for a while now. In the discourse surrounding AI this question takes on two forms: the first ...