We can begin with the very simple
fact that a higher salary is not necesarily an assurance of financial stability. A worker might
recieve a little more money this year but spend much more on his rented room,
vegetables, cooking gas, electricity and the journey to work. He has become
poorer despite the rise. And the monthly sum tells us nothing about the hours
he must give for it. If eight hours becomes ten or twelve, or if some days are
marked absent and not paid, the same salary means something quite Different.
One need not know much economics to see this. Yet the factory accounts count
money and time as though they were seperate from the actual person living
through them. The first abstract machine is this conversion itself. Here by abstract machine I mean a kind of conretion of universality in a an assemblage of heterogenous material relations. A number
written on the payslip passes through rent, prices and exhausted hours, and
turns into food on a plate, or the lack of it. Nobody has to believe in the
number for it to work. (Marx, 1867, chs. 17 and 20; ILO and IHD, 2024)
In chapter 6 of Capital Marx asks
us to look at what is really being sold when someone takes a job. The wokrer is
selling his capacity to work for the day, what Marx calls labour-power. He is
not selling the finished shirt or the finished pair of shoes. Once the employer
has bought that day he can use it to make things worth much more than the wage
he paid. Imagine, simply, that in the first part of the day a worker has
already made enough value to cover his wages. He has still got the rest of his
shift to finish, and what is made in that remaining time goes to the employer.
Marx calls this surplus-value. We do not have to pretend that all the factory's
other expenses are imaginary. The important thing is that the labourer's wage
is not the same thing as all the value his labour can produce. The agreement to
sell his time also means giving somebody else Control over what that time will
become. (Marx, 1867, chs. 6, 7 and 9)
This is why Marx's discussion of
wages in chapter 19 is so important. The payslip tells a story in which the
whole day appears to have been paid for. There is an amount, a date, perhaps a
number of hours, and finally a signature. What it does not show is the division
between the time in which the worker makes the equivalent of his wage and the
time in which he makes more than that. This is the mystification of the wage
form.
The timeclock and
the pay packet themselves produce this appearance, and every morning the body
enters the factory under its terms. Even when the factory turns out more
shirts, the workers share need not rise with them. The employer owns what is
produced and decides, within the limits of law and conflict, how much is
returned as pay. The payslip has become an objective way of making this
relation appear natural. (Marx, 1867, chs. 9 and 19)
Now consider what happens when a
factory purchases a faster cutting machine. More cloth can be cut in the same
hour, fewer people may be needed for a particular job, and the factory may earn
more from the goods it sells. None of this means that the person standing
beside the machine will automatically get a raise. Sometimes wages stay still
while work becomes faster. Sometimes a company doesnt need to hire as many
people as before. Marx discusses this in his chapters on machines and the
working day, but the matter can be seen on an ordinary garment line. The new
machine is also a new arrangement of bodies: each bundle has a time, each
stitch a tolerance, every hour a required number of pieces. The machine's speed
becomes the workers speed, and finally something by which the worker himself is
Judged. This is how a technical improvment can become an instrument for taking
more work without giving back more pay. (Marx, 1867, chs. 12-15 and 17)
A factory can therefore become
busier, or even richer, without the ordinary worker earning any more. There is
a difference between money coming into the business and money reaching the
people who make its products. Some goes on fabric, electricity, rent, machines,
loans and the earnings kept by owners. Even a report saying that the factory
spent more on wages may only mean it hired more peolpe or made them work more
hours. It doesnt tell us what happened to one person's pay. Studies of India's
organised manufacturing have shown that workers did not always get a share of
the gains when factories produced more. We should therefore ask a very basic
question: where did the extra money go? A busy floor, a larger warehouse or a
new building tells us very little about the wages of the people inside it. The
factory has many accounts and many people who can make a claim on its income.
The worker is only one of them. (Abraham and Sasikumar, 2017; Basole and
Narayan, 2020)
Another reason wages remain low is
that there are many people who need work, and not nearly enough secure jobs. A
man cannot bargain easily if ten others are waiting at the gate for his place.
Some arrive from villages, some have lost work elsewhere, and some already have
jobs but need a second source of income. New machinery can make this worse when
a company begins to produce more without employing more hands. Marx calls this
the relative surplus population. He does not mean that there are simply too many
human beings. He means that the economy keeps producing people whose labour is
available but whom employers do not need to hire on decent terms. It is a
relation between the factory and the world outside its gate. The person who is
not hired is also present inside the workshop, as the possible replacement of
the one who is. In this way industrial Growth can sit alongside a growing fear
of losing one's employment, and that fear makes a wage rise harder to demand.
(Marx, 1867, ch. 25; ILO and IHD, 2024)
The garment trade adds another
difficulty. A large buyer may place an order at a particular price and demand
that it arrive quickly. The factory in Noida then has to complete it, sometimes
by giving parts of the work to contractors. The contractor recruits people for
a few weeks or months, another supplier brings cloth, and somebody else
arranges the transport. Everybody in this chain wants to keep their own costs
down. It is often the workers who feel the pressure most directly. They have to
produce more pieces, faster, while their pay stays much the same. The buyer may
be outside India and may never see the workers whose time he is buying
indirectly. This does not prove every factory owner is making enormous profits:
fabric, transport and delays can genuinely be costly. But we cannot simply say
that 'the market' has forced low wages, as if the market was a weather
condition. There are actual people making decisions about prices, delivery
times and pay. The pressure travels down a chain of contracts until it reaches
a body at a sewing machine. (Anner, 2019; Nathan et al., 2024)
There is also the plain question:
why doesnt the worker just leave for another job? Leaving costs money. One may
lose a week's pay, pay for transport, spend days searching and still return
with nothing. In an industrial area where the factories offer much the same low
wage, having several employers nearby does not necessarily give a worker much
choice. A company can keep offering low pay because it knows that people cannot
afford to stay unemployed while they look for something better. Economists have
a technical name for this kind of employer power (labour-market monopsony) but its meaning is simple
enough: the worker needs a job more urgently than the company needs that
particular worker. Even a legal minimum wage can become the amount everybody
pays, rather than the beginning of a better wage. The factory might get richer
and its workers may remain where they was. The price of labour is made through
this unequal freedom to wait, to move, and to refuse. (Manning, 2003; Marx,
1867, ch. 25)
Factories do sometimes have genuine
problems selling what they make. An order may be cancelled, a buyer may delay
payment, or cloth and electricity may become more expensive. If ordinary people
themselves have very little money, they cannot buy many of the goods being
produced. But these difficulties cannot explain away every low wage, nor make
every complaint unreasonable. There is also the hours themselves. A worker
promised a monthly amount might find that the day has grown longer while the
money remains the same. What seemed like a wage increase can disappear when
measured against the time given up. In piece-rate work the pressure is even
more direct: you earn according to how many pieces you finish, and learn to
hurry yourself without a supervisor having to shout. The body begins to keep
the factory's accounts for it. An output tagret is a kind of wage law written
into muscle before it is written into a Statute. (Marx, 1867, chs. 20-21;
Anner, 2019)
Consider the technical expression
'good pieces per hour'. It cannot be translated Adequately into the ordinary
sense. The term belongs to a self-contained operative discourse: a set of economic transitions, recognised faluts and anticipations that rearranges what Bodies can
do. 'Good pieces' includes inspection, the permitted seam, the factory's buyer,
the line supervisor, a spreadsheet cell and the next person's hands. This is an
Abstract machine because an apparently Abstract measure acts through quite
concrete things. It fixes the order of work, the pace of breathing, when
somebody can stand, the risk of a rejected gamrent and what ultimately enters
the pay packet. Capital's abstraction is practical, not metaphorical. The wage
are already material semiosis, a system of signs producing the social life it
claims only to recrod. (Marx, 1867, chs. 1, 19 and 21)
This is the economic history upon
which the Modi Government has imposed the four labour codes. On 21 November
2025 the Code on Wages, the Industrial Relations Code, the Social Security Code
and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code came into
effect, replacing twenty-nine Central labour laws. To call this
'simplification' already puts the state inside an employers vocabulary. The
removed statutes was not clerical duplication: among them were the Trade Unions
Act of 1926, the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act of 1946 and the
Industrial Disputes Act of 1947, legislative deposits of a century of conflict
over who may speak collectively, when dismissal can Happen and what records
must exist. The new structure takes an Economy already prdoucing low wages and
changes the conditions under which workers might interrupt it. This is the
point at which economic pressure becomes politically organised repression.
(Government of India, 2025; PRS Legislative Research, 2020)
The Industrial Relations Code
raises the general central threshold for Certified standing orders from 100 to
300 workers, and the threshold for prior government permission for specified
retrenchments, layoffs and closures in factories, mines and plantations
likewise moves to 300. It does not erase every duty to give notice or
compensate below that number, yet it withdraws a very particular obstruction to
the employers decision. More gravely, the Code extends strike-notice
requirements across indusrtial establishments: a worker have to give notice,
may not strike within fourteen days and faces prohibitions during specified
proceedings. A stoppgae timed for the day a shipment leaves can be decisive; a
stoppage postponed until its commodity has departed becomes another action
altogether. What looks like a nuetral calendar is an apparatus for allocating
the power to determine Industrial time. The buyer can keep a deadline; the
worker is given a waiting period. Here law Writes itself into the factory's
timetable like another Production instruction. (Industrial Relations Code,
2020, ss. 28, 62; PRS, 2020)
The State further recognizes
Fixed-term employment and systems of negotiating unions defined by thresholds
of recorded membership. A contract that runs out can end a livelihood without
the recognisable drama of dismissal, while a flucutating contractor workforce
is difficult to gather into a stable bargaining roll. The Code on Wages
promises a Minimum and timely payment, yet a floor remains a poverty wage if it
does not follow the cost of the actual city, and a promise is easily made
useless when a Worker cannnot risk a complaint. The safety code changes
important statutory thresholds, includnig the general Definition of a factory
Employing power-driven workers and contract-labour licensing. The Social
Security Code names new beneficiaries but many benefits still require schemes,
eligibility, administration and money reaching a household. The four codes are
one machine: they record the worker, classify the employer, certify the
compliant payroll and make the collective interruption of production harder to
carry out. (Government of India, 2025; Industrial Relations Code, 2020; PRS
Legislative Research, 2020)
The April prtoests supplies a test
of what this classification protects. About 40,000 workers were reported to
have protested in the Noida industrial belt; more than 350 arrests were
reported after the disturbances, alongside police action and a late wage
announcement. The increase to ₹13,690 did not produce the wage that workers had
calculated they required. What the event makes visible is that the market's
price of labour-power had to be altered through a disruption of production, and
that the state answered with both a revised price and coercive force.
Repression is not the original reason why the wage had fallen beihnd life, but
it enters exactly where the mechanism of wage determination becomes politically
disputeable. The abstract formula 'industrial peace' now has an identifiable
Material content: a production gate, armed Police, names on FIRs, and an Export
order protected from collective refusal. (Reuters, 2026; Jain, 2026; Hindustan
Times, 2026)
One can make a comparisn with Fascist Italy which is precise at the level of the law's ambition to make class antagonism
administratively governable. Under the Rocco law of 3 April 1926, independent
collective representation was displaced by state-recognised organisations, and
strikes and lockouts were prohibited. The Carta del Lavoro of 1927 represented
production as a single national organism: the supposedly common welfare of
employers and workers was secured by eliminating their indepednent means of
conflict. The modern Indian phrase 'ease of doing business' performs a related ideological
operation when a removal of workers leverage is narrated as a general Benefit
to the nation. There is a profound structural parallel in making organised
labour subordinate to the Requirements of production as determined from above.
Yet the precise legal forms differ: Indian trade unoins have not been
legally abolished and the new Code has not instituted the Italian one-party
corporative Syndicate. The compairson Becomes stronger, not weaker, when it
names the shared operation rather than inventing a identical legal text.
(Italian Senate, 1925-27; Carta del Lavoro, 1927; PRS, 2020)
Nazi Germany provides a still more
violent historical revelation of this logic. On 2 May 1933 its unions' offices
were seized, leaders taken into custody and Assets Confiscated; the German
Labour Front was established days later in place of autonomous organisations.
Trustees appointed by the state determined conditions of work, and the 1934
ordering of national labour Placed the employer within an authoritarian plant
hierarchy. The Nazi regime did not merely repress communist propositions: it
destroyed the institutions through which workers could make a material claim on
accumulated value. Its propaganda insisted upon a single National community in
which the antagonisim of capital and labour had supposedly evaporated. Fascism
requires that appearance Because a person divided against an employer must
instead recognise himself as an undivided unit of the nation. The worker's
hands may perform the same repetitive industrial movements; the meainng and
direction of those movements have been transferred into the image of a
harmonious national productive body. (German Historical Institute, 1933; United
States Department of State, 1934; Deutsches Historisches Museum, n.d.)
Here is the material-semiosis of
Fascism, in its most concrete form. An employment category Becomes a stamp; the
stamp decdies whether an association can bargain; the notice period Decides the
day upon which a body may stop moving; a police order decide whether bodies can
assemble outside the gate. In Fascist Italy the state-recognised syndicate
decided who represented a 'category'. In the Third Reich the factory leader and
labour trustee translated class conflict into a Command. In Noida the worker is
classified across principal employer, contractor, fixed-term employee and a
muster roll, while the law restricts the timing of refusal. These arrangements
are not identical regimes, but their family resemblence is not a mere likeness
of slogans. They are machines for turning a political contrdiction into the
apparently technical question of whether a procedure was folloewd. That is how
a concrete abstraction disposes bodies, before anybody asks whether they share
the same opinion. (Industrial Relations Code, 2020; German Historical
Institute, 1933; Carta del Lavoro, 1927)
The Transition from declining wages
to fascist politics is neither automatic nor a property of the mere use of
numbers. A cricket field and a fascist parade are not fascist because both
depend on specialised words and trained reflexes. The relevant transformation
occur where the financial contradiction of accumulation is recoded as a demand
for Obedience, where the organised demand for a higher share of value is made
into an attack on the nation's body. Productivity becmoes patriotism, striking
becomes sabotage, the foreign buyer vanishes from view while the worker who
delays delivery is made the obstacle to prosperity. This is an economic
semitoics with coercive instruments: legal classifications, police reports,
Productivity dashboards and National slogans do their work together. It is the
only useful sense in which this History of legislation can be read beside
Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany without pretending that their racial policies,
one-party dictatorships and annihilatory violence have been identically
reproduced in India. (Marx, 1867, chs. 19, 25 and 28; German Historical
Institute, 1933)
Marx finishes this story within
Volume I itself, in the so-called primitvie accumulation and the 'bloody
legislation' examined in chapter 28. The labour market whose wages appear to be
naturally fixed by supply and demand was historically created through
expropriation and laws which forced people to sell their capacity to work. The
law was never Outside the economic relation. In Noida the sequence returns in
modern clothes. A factory can make more goods without paying its workers much
more. There are people waiting for jobs, and large buyers pressuring factories
to deliver cheaply and quickly. The wage form hides the division of the working
day; the state then rewrites the institutional memory of collective resistance
as if it were excess paperwork. This is the simpler economic truth behind
stagnation: more production does not mean more wages, when the people producing
things have so little power to claim them. The new Codes help to secure this
relation by making resistance costly and late. Their hostile genius lies
precisely in making an existing distribution of wealth seem an administrative
necessity. That is what the Noida workers Interupted. (Marx, 1867, chs. 17-21,
25 and 28; Basole and Narayan, 2020; PRS, 2020)
PART II. MARX'S FIRST VOLUME, AND
THE HISTORY OF AN INDIAN WAGE
Buying labour-power: why the price
of work is a strange Price
Volume I of Marx's Capital supplies
a critique of political economy which becomes genuinely useful only after the
preceding economic distinctions have been made. In the chapters on the buying
and selling of labour-power, Marx begins with a peculiar contract. A person
sells the capacity to labour for a period; the owner of money buys the
temporary use of that capacity. the Commodity being purchased is not a
completed shirt but the labour-power which can make shirts. The distinction
identifies the wage as a price attached to the reproduction of a capacity,
including the historical and social standards by which people live and raise
the next generation of wrokers. The price may move above or below that value;
wages also vary across skills and laobur markets. This is quite differnt from
saying, at the outset, that a worker is simply paid too little because captial
takes surplus labour. One must first establish what is purchased, for how long,
at which market price and under which conditions. (Marx, Capital I, chs. 6 and
19)
Marx's chapter on the working day
offers the next determination. the employer has bought the right to use
labour-power for a duration, but the worker's body has a finite capacity to
recover. A dispute over whether eight, ten or twelve hours may be demanded is
therefore not an ethical commentary laid over economics; it concerns the
magnitude of the Commodity transferred in the conract. Two people may receive
the same daily payment although one expends several more hours, so that the
actual wage per hour is markedly differnt. Overtime and piece rates further
complicate this appearance. A worker can receive a slightly higher total wage
precisely because an enormous amount of extra labour-time has been sold. In the
language of ordinary administration the payslip shows improved compensation. In
the language of Volume I the transaction must be examined through the length,
intensity and distribution of working time. (Marx, Capital I, ch. 10)
Chapters on relative surplus value,
cooperation, manufacture and machinry show why an increasing productivity does
not itself require a higher wage. the capitalist seeks to produce more
commodities in less socially necessary laobur-time. A factory that organises
several workers into a coordinated prodcuction sequence, standardizes motions
or introduces mechanised cutting can multiply the quantity produced by a day of
work. A portion of the advantage may become profit before rivals copy the
method; the wider diffusion of technical change can reduce commodity values and
alter the value of labour-power itself if necessities become cheaper. Yet the
change does not legislate a higher price for the capacity to work. Capital
reorganizes the production process to reduce the portion of the working day
required to reproduce the wage, not to distribute technological gains as a
moral dividend. One can therefore see the distinctness of two questions: why
more value or more units are produced, and why remuneration changes little.
Economists now study the latter through Labour demad, factor shares, market
power and bargaining; Marx gives an account of how these dynamics belong to
capitalist production itself. (Marx, Capital I, chs. 12–15)
Machinery introduces another
movement which is often ignored in sentimental Histories of industrial
progress. A new machine does not simply make the existing worker more
comfortable or more skilled. It can alter the composition of a workforce,
replace occupations, bring different workers into an industry and lower the
amount of labour required per unit of output. Marx discusses how the use of
machines can subject a person to the rhythm of an apparatus that stands over
her as something already organised. This is particularly important for a
material semiosis of the factroy. A rate of production ceases to be a
description of what people happened to do yesterday. It becomes a command
entered into a board, a timer, a machine setting, a hiring plan and a dismissal
decision. the abstract target acquires Gears, footsteps, muscles and exhausted
eyes. The eonomic logic of technical change is made bodily effective through
signs that regulate its pace. (Marx, Capital I, ch. 15; HeatWatch and TISS,
2026)
Part VI of Volume I is
indispensable here. In the chapter on the transformation of the value of
labour-power into wages, Marx explains the inverted appearance whereby the
price of labour-power looks like the price of laobur itself. the distinction
between paid and unpaid portions of the working day disappears in the
wage-form: all hours seem to have been paid because a sum of money is
transferred after them. Chapter 20 on time wages and Chapter 21 on piece wages
then show why different payment systems can intensify work without announcing
an explicit wage cut. If pay is attached to each piece, the worker may be
required to maintain the rate at which pieces are completed; the posted piece
price can remain stable while the technical conditions of Producing a piece
change. Even time Wages can conceal reductions in the effective wage when the
number of productive or paid hours is rearranged. The wage-form is an eonomic
sign with real effects, and its appearance should itself be an object of
investigation. (Marx, Capital I, chs. 19–21)
The chapters on simple reproducton
and accumulation explain why the wage relationship is repeatedly Renewed
despite the fact that the individuals in it are replaced. Workers spend wages
on the goods necessary to return to work; capitalists use part of their
proceeds to restart prodcuction and expand the means by which labour is
employed. The appearance of two independent transactions conceals the
continuity of the system. Wage income maintains the population from which
laobur can be purchased again; accumulation continually modifies how many of
these hours capital wishes to buy. In Chapter 25, Marx develops the changing
ratio of capital devoted to means of production and capital used to purchase
labour-power, and the formation of a relative surplus population. The term is
relational: people are 'surplus' to captial's demand for their labour at given
conditions, not surplus to humanity or incapable of productive activity. This
gives a systematic connection between the economy's labour-saving Development
and the persistence of workers who cannot obtain sufficient paid hours. (Marx,
Capital I, chs. 23–25)
It is still inadequate to call this
entire sequence a single theory of surplus value and declare the Noida case
settled. Volume I identifies several distinct causes and forms: the limits
imposed by the value of labour-power, competition among capitals that raises
prodctivity, the industrial organization of the working day, changing labour
demand with mechanisation, piece-rate and time-rate systems, and the
reproduction of an availble population. Contemporary labour economics specifies
mechanisms Marx does not estimate in modern terms: search frictions,
concentration among employers, the power of international buyers and changes in
nominal price indices. the valuable use of Marx is to show why those separate
mechanics compose a soical process that reproduces the wage relation, rather
than to rename every observed cause 'extraction' and imagine that a word has
done the work of explanation. A soical theory is strongest when the empirical
operations remain differentiated Inside it. (Marx, Capital I; Manning, 2003;
Abraham and Sasikumar, 2017)
The abstract machine of a wage:
symbols that people must physically obey
The factroy is full of terms which
do not need to be understood by anyone outside its operations. A target is
expressed in pieces per hour; defects enter a quality sheet; downtime is
registered against the line; the person who did the work appears in one
payroll, while the company selling the shirt appears in another. the language
is abstract because it can be carried across plants and weeks without carrying
every individual life along with it. But its abstraction has a physical
circuit. A number on the board rearranges movements at fifty machines; a label
in the HR system decides who receives sickness pay; the count of employees
recorded under one registered establishment changes the applicable legal
procedure. The capacity of a system of signs to act over differnt settings
without ceasing to be material is what may be called an abstract machine. It is
not a technological metaphor. It is a practical grammar of who can Command,
what counts as output, how time is measured and where costs appear. (Marx, Capital
I, chs. 15, 19–21; PRS, 2020)
A factroy's takt time or
standard minute value belongs to a comparable closed field of practical
distinctions. It is not understood merely by knowing what the English words
mean. A Manager reads a rate, a worker adjusts a movement, an accountant imputes
a laobur cost and a buyer assesses a unit price. The same sign has travelled
through bodies and ledgers. To call it a self-contained discourse does not say
that it floats above the world; it describes the way a technical language both
depends upon and reproduces a special field of material practices.
Marx's analysis of commodity
fetishism gives this argument its economic seriousness. A commodity exchange
equates Heterogeneous products and the different forms of laobur they contain.
the equivalence is carried out socially before anyone has to pronounce a theory
of equivalence. Money does not merely symbolise value in the harmless sense of
a word standing for an Object: it permits goods to move, debt to be paid and
laobur-power to be hired. A rupee-denominated wage is consequently an
abstraction which can purchase actual food and Exclude the worker from it when
there are too few rupees. The laobur code is likewise effective through the
forms in which it can recognise a person: 'worker', 'employee', 'contract
labour', 'fixed-term employee', 'gig worker', 'establishment', 'principal
employer'. The material semiosis of law is the power of these classifications
to reorganize an ordinary life, not simply the rhetoric with which a minister
defends them. (Marx, Capital I, chs. 1, 3 and 19; PRS, 2020)
Breman: a labour market reproduced
outside the Factory
Jan Breman's Footloose Labour
follows people who circulate from agrarian employment into casual, temporray
and distant work, often returning to the village when employment ceases. His
ethnography in south Gujarat makes a severe objection to the picture of
industrial labour as a pool of perfectly mobile, self-supporting individuals.
Mobility has expenses: transport, lost earnings, housing, debts and the time
needed to find another purchaser of labour. Households and communities finance
the gaps between jobs. Capital can buy labour when required without paying
continuously for the reproduction of every person who might next be called.
This is a material eonomic Arrangement. It keeps a supply of labour available
even when there are insufficient full-year jobs to Purchase it, and it helps
explain why the Reservation wage—the lowest wage a person can practically
accept—is driven close to desperate necessity. (Breman, 1996)
Breman also forces a distinction
between an industiral establishment's labour demad and the livelihood of people
attached to it. A firm's decision to reduce a Workforce after an order has been
completed may be rational inside its accounts because unused Labour time is a
cost. the family whose member has been released still has to maintain that
person, but this appears nowhere on the factory balance sheet. Rural income and
urban waegs must therefore be studied in one regional economy. If the village
offers a Reliable alternative, a worker can leave an underpaying city job. If
agriculture is itself unable to sustain those returning, the alternative wage
remains low and the factory's hiring position becomes stronger. No threatening
supervisor is needed for this economic dependence to arise, though coercion,
caste restrictions and the law can deepen it. What Breman describes is the
distribution of the cost of labour availability across the whole life of a
person. (Breman, 1996; Drèze and Das, 2024)
In his 2024 assessment of
postcolonial India, Breman characterises the persistence of casualised
employment as a major failure of the developmental Promise to replace agrarian
deprivation with durable industrial livelihoods. His criticism of the neoliberal
turn joins employment statistics to the actual politics of land, urban
residence and labour rigths. It helps to explain why a worker employed in a
technologically modern plant need not belong to a stable industiral working
class. The modernity of the commodity has no necessary correspondence with the
modernity of the worker's conditions. The plant is an organised productive
machine Whose payroll is integrated with local economies of dispossession. This
is the specific bridge from technical wage stagnation to the village,
contractor and rented room. (Breman, 2024)
The Patnaiks: external demand,
price compression and the metropolitan need for cheapness
Utsa and Prabhat Patnaik's A Theory
of Imperialism is concerned with the internatonal Organisation of commodity
suply and the conditions under which metropolitan capitalism Secures products
from tropical and subtropical regions. They argue that pressure upon the
incomes of peripheral producers helps keep commodities availble without the
price increases that might otherwise accompany demand from wealthy countries.
This is not a direct estimate of Garment wages in Noida, and the argument must
be located at its own scale. It nonetheless changes how a seemingly technical
export price is interpreted. The buying firm and its suppliers are participants
in a worldwide economy in which the capacity to hold down prodcuction costs and
the incomes of primary producers can serve the stability of consumption
elsewhere. (Patnaik and Patnaik, 2016)
The connection to apparel is
structural rather than a claim that the book specifically modeled the 2026
garment trade. the buyer who controls an order's price creates pressure to find
efficiency inside its supply chain. The supplier's freedom to raise wages is
constrained by the cost of losing orders; a worker's capacity to move is
constrained by the small Number of sufficiently remunerative Alternatives.
Domestic mass demand Remains weak because many households receive little
inocme, while export competitiveness becomes a reason repeated in governmental
and business policy to keep laobur costs 'reasonable'. The Patnaiks invite us
to ask why the expansion of production for distant markets can become
compatible with restrictions on the mass consumption of the people carrying out
that production. Their account adds the political economy of international
price relations to labour-demand economics without dissolving one into the
other. (Patnaik and Patnaik, 2016; Anner, 2019).
Chakrabarty: the other histories
folded into an industrial rate
Dipesh Chakrabarty's distinction
between History 1 and History 2 in Provincializing Europe creates a necessary
difficulty for a total eonomic explanation. Capital attempts continually to
reproduce the conditions of its own existence and to translate differnt
activities into abstract labour. But the concrete worlds from which workers
arrive have histories, obligations and practices that cannot all be deduced
from this logic. Religious belonging, caste, kinship, migration, gender,
household duties and forms of political allegiance alter how people encounter
the wage. None are ornamental local colour around an otherwise Universal
employmnt contract. They help determine access to jobs, the capacity to
migrate, the hours made available for paid work and who Bears the cost of the
household when a wage fails. (Chakrabarty, 2000)
It would defeat Chakrabarty's
purpose to turn these relations into an inventory of old-fashioned impediments
awaiting removal by an efficient market. An employer buys formally abstract
hours, yet the person who can present those hours at the gate has alreay been
shaped by decisions made elsewhere. A woman arriving after unpaid child care, a
worker tied to a Village debt, a migrant whose accommodation depends on
continued employment and a man able to call upon wealthy relatives do not have
identical capacities to refuse the same nominal rate. Their wages are
transacted in a modern market but the Conditions of Their market participation
are historically thick. Chakrabarty thus corrects both a crude eonomic
determinism and the opposite temptation to abandon economics for social
description. The economic mechanism is real; its concrete existence does not
abolish soical histories which it cannot itself fully generate. (Chakrabarty,
2000; Breman, 1996)
The four thinkers should now be
read together in a definite order. An economist identifies inadequate demad for
Stable labour-hours, monopsonistic wage-setting, buyer price pressure, capital
deepening, the distribution of value added and the purchasing-power loss
produced by inflation. Marx's Volume I establishes why capitalist Production
systematically reorganises labour-time and why the apparent price of laobur
conceals the historical purchase of labour-power. Breman shows how a moving
population supplies that labour in conditions of interrupted employment. the
Patnaiks situate price and income compression inside a global geography of
markets. Chakrabarty reveals the historical worlds through which the abstract
employment relation is actually lived. None of the latter three should be
permitted to replace the first account with a grand word. Their significance is
to explain how an economic mechanism becomes reproducible as a social world.
(Manning, 2003; Marx, Capital I; Breman, 1996; Patnaik and Patnaik, 2016;
Chakrabarty, 2000)
PART III. THE HOURS OUTSIDE THE
WAGE: BODIES, ROOMS AND THE INDUSTRIAL CITY
When a production target becomes an
instruction to a body
The wrokers who reported a target
of seventy pieces in an hour described pain in the back, hands and joints, the
humiliation of falling short and the pressure to remain at a machine longer
than the body could comfortably sustain. the number seventy looks innocently
quantitative. Its force is nevertheless neither abstract in the ordinary sense
nor reducible to a manager's personal cruelty. A Predetermined laobur standard
permits managers to calculate the number of people required to meet an order,
the wage cost of each unit and the duration for which a production line must
remain open. The worker comes to experience a rate determined in advance as the
Correct motion of her own limbs. It is this movement from number to gesture
which makes prodctivity into a material semiotic phenomenon. A target has been
translated into a daily shape for the body, and the body is subsequently judged
by the target which organised it. (Jain, 2026a; Marx, Capital I, ch. 15)
There is an important distinction
between increased physical exertion and increased eonomic prodctivity. A worker
may complete more pieces because the machine is better, because the fabric has
been standardised, because the order consists of simpler garments, because
rests are shorter, or becuase unpaid preparatory tasks have been removed from
the official time sheet. Each produces a different interpretation of the rise
in pieces per hour. Firms can report higher prodctivity without recording the
intensification of bodily labour separately. the economist needs consistent
measures of output, labour hours, material quality and capital used, rather
than a Simple count of garments. The ethnographer needs to watch which part of
an hour has ceased to count as paid work and which new physical demands make
the improved rate possible. A technical wage analysis becomes richer, not
Weaker, when the bodily labour beneath the data is made visible. (Marx, Capital
I, chs. 10 and 15; HeatWatch and TISS, 2026)
Heat makes this distinction
especially visible. HeatWatch and the Tata Institute of Social Sciences
reported in February 2026 on 115 garment wrokers, 47 in-depth interviews,
home-based workers and fifteen garment or textile establishments across several
industiral regions, including sites in Delhi-NCR. The report Describes the
production pressure, water problems and insufficient protection encountered
during hot working Conditions. Econometric research on Indian manufacturing has
separately shown that high temperature reduces attendance and output, while
climate control can mitigate some of the loss. Here one can see a Dispute over
who must pay for the maintenance of productive labour-power: should the
employer purchase adequate cooling and water, should the worker lose earnings
when heat overwhelms her, or should a public hospital absorb the consequences?
The price of avoiding a prodctivity loss is different depending upon whose
accounts are read. (HeatWatch and TISS, 2026; Somanathan et al., 2021)
The distinction between a cooling
investment and a wage increment is economically revealing. Installing
ventilation has an upfront captial cost, but can protect Throughput and reduce
lost Working days. Paying wrokers more increases the wage bill, and may not
immediately change the firm's cooling equipment. Neither is a substitute for
the other. If the firm economises on both, the savings appear in its cost
accounts while fatigue and lost health appear in a different household's time.
This is not a metaphor about the capitalist appetite for bodies. It is a
measurable external cost: an action affecting someone whose losses are not
included in the firm's ordinary calculation. The effect becomes severe when a
worker lacks a stable employmnt relation through which to claim sick pay,
compensation or adjustment of the production target. (Somanathan et al., 2021;
HeatWatch and TISS, 2026)
Naya Gaon: rent as an industrial
variable
Naya Gaon near Sector 83 cannot be
excluded from a map of industrial Noida Merely because houses stand outside
factory fences. Reporting described narrow lanes, divided rooms, shared toilets
and buildings occupied by families working in the neighbouring industrial
economy. For a worker on a low monthly wage, proximity to a plant saves money
and time otherwise spent commuting; but living in the industiral district is
itself a purchase from a local property market. the worker may pay a landlord
who benefits from demand created by factory employment while having no relation
to the factroy's payroll. High rents can destroy the improvement in purcahsing
power which a small nominal increment might have offered. The supply of
affordable rooms, the quality of public transit and the location of employment
therefore shape effective real wages as much as the prices at a market stall.
(Jain, 2026e)
What happens when the family is too
expensive to keep together? Noida reporting describes children sent to
relatives in other towns or remaining in the village because the parent's wage
could not support their living costs near the factory. Economic analysis often
treats this as a household response to an income constraint: relatives supply
accommodation or care which the worker cannot purchase at urban prcies. Yet
this has effects over many years. the child's schooling and residence change;
the adult's capacity to spend time with family narrows; Rural households
transfer labour and money towards Maintaining an urban earner. The wage paid by
the factory does not purchase the whole infrastructure which makes the
factroy's Employees ready for another day. An unpriced domestic contribution
has helped make the market price of laobur possible. (Jain, 2026e; Breman,
1996; Chakrabarty, 2000)
The 2024 Time Use Survey recorded
long daily journeys for people commuting to employment-related activity, and a
striking Gender difference in unpaid domestic work. Travelling, waiting,
shopping, cleaning, cooking and arranging care can occupy a substantial part of
a day before the wage-earning shift even begins. The commuter does not normally
receive the hourly wage for the Period spent reaching the factroy. The woman
doing care at home usually receives no market payment for the reproducton of
another wage Earner's capacity to work. These are distinct eonomic categories:
time required by employment but not bought by the employer, and unpaid
household production indispensable to the continuity of employment. Treating
them as nothing because they are missing from the industrial wage bill would
repeat the mistake of confusing a firm's private accounts with the resources
required by the entire social process. (MoSPI, 2025; Marx, Capital I, ch. 23)
Debt, interrupted wages and the
economics of being unable to leave
A person with savings can search
for another job while Paying rent. A person borrowing at high informal interest
cannot. the price of credit consequently affects the willingness to remain in
an underpaid job, because a break between wages becomes a financial emergency.
A single illness, rent arrear or cancellation of a shift can trigger borrowing,
late fees, loss of accommodation and the need to accept the next availble post.
Labour supply is not simply the supply of bodies. It is the supply of people facing
differnt financial deadlines. Those deadlines can make an employer's wage Offer
more effective even if the employer never knows the identity of the lender.
(Breman, 1996; Manning, 2003)
The household's liability runs
ahead of the firm's purchase order. Rent comes due on an ordinary calendar,
while work can arrive by the shipment. A contractor may have no job this week;
a child continues to eat this week; remittances still need to be sent home. the
temporal arrangement of the employment relation allows the principal company to
buy a variable quantity of work, while the worker bears much of the risk of
variable demand. In the language of economics this is an allocation of risk and
liquidity costs between agents who possess Unequal reserves. The worker's
apparent freedom to turn down a shift exists in the presence of a costly
alternative. A leagl provision for an employmnt benefit matters precisely
because it can alter this alternative, giving the worker the eonomic Means to
refuse otherwise unacceptable terms. (Breman, 2024; Marx, Capital I, ch. 23)
PART IV. THE FOUR LABOUR CODES: A
LEGISLATIVE REARRANGEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POWER
What twenty-nine laws represented
before they were compressed
The Modi govenment's announcement
of 21 November 2025 brought into effect the Code on Wages, the Industrial
Relations Code, the Social Security Code and the Occupational Safety, Health
and Working Conditions Code, replacing twenty-nine central labour enactments.
Calling this a single act of simplification conceal the different historical
struggles whose statutes are being Rearranged. The Trade Unions Act of 1926
provided an organisational legal identity for wrokers' associations. The
Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act of 1946 gave an enforceable form to
the conditions under which a person could be classified, suspended or
dismissed. The Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 established mechanisms for
industrial disputes and particular protections around retrenchment and closure.
The Factories Act and a network of other laws treated hours, health, welfare
and the regulation of contractors as distinct obligations. None of these
statutes produced equality across the workforce. Many workers remained outside
effective enforcement. But their very incompleteness is not an argument for
eliminating important constraints Which did exist. (Ministry of Labour, 2025;
PRS, 2020)
The government describes the
replacement of multiple laws by four codes as rationalisation. The eonomic
meaning of rationalisation, however, depends upon what is being rendered easier
to calculate and control. For the company, a simpler compliance architecture
may reduce the number of forms and inspections. For the worker, a change in the
definition of an establishment or the threshold above which an employer
requires prior permission to retrench can remove a procedural means of
resisting loss of income. Some Provisions create new categories of benefits and
some extend formally stated coverage. The decisive critical question is wether
they supply an enforceable claim when a Worker faces an actual employer and a
particular payroll, or instead create a leagl record of rigths that can only be
pursued after the industrial decision has already been taken. (PRS, 2020; PRS,
2026b)
Here a law becomes an abstract
machine in a precise way. A 300-worker threshold does not look like a command
about the body. It is a classification with a conditional consequence. Count
the establishment one way and the leagl condition for prior govenment
permission applies; count it differently and that condition does not. A payroll
figure has the power to alter what may happen to three hundred people. A rule
about a strike notice similarly reorganises time. It declares periods when
collective action is not available in its ordinary form, regardless of when a
wage grievance Begins to destroy the household's finances. the law has made the
interval between factory production and collective refusal part of its very
machinry. (PRS, 2020; PRS, 2026b)
Code on Wages: a floor too far
below a life
The Code on Wages brings together
laws concerning minimum wages, wage payments, bonuses and equal remuneration,
and envisages a central floor wage beneath relevant state minimum rates. The
govenment's language of universal coverage must be tested against the
difference Between a legally notified rate and a monthly life that can be
reproduced on it. A legal wage does not guarantee that the worker can rent a
habitable room, cook with sufficient fuel, travel safely and support
dependants. The problem becomes acute when the rate is based on a consumption
norm that is not transparent to those compelled to live on its results. PRS's
analysis of the Central Rules notified in May 2026 noted that the rules
themselves left calculation criteria for minimum wages to a subsequent
govenment order. That is not a minor drafting deficiency: the bundle of
necessities entering a rate, and the price assigned to each, determines the
substance of the entitlement. (PRS, 2019; PRS, 2026a)
The law's official floor may become
a ceiling in industrial practice. This occurs when firms across a
laobur-abundant market offer the minimum as the habitual rate rather than
bargain above it. the notification then serves as a pricing convention. It declares
a lawful sum, gets entered into payroll Software and circulates Through
contractor agreements as a number to be reproduced. Workers' actual capacity to
secure a higher amount depends on whether firms must compete for scarce labour,
wether there is independent bargaining power and whether living costs are
allowed to define what a wage should purchase. The supposed neutrality of a
minimum hides a political decision to locate the cost of housing, food,
transport and care either inside or outside the recognised labour price. In
Noida the gap between the leagl number and life could be seen before any
spreadsheet was opened. (PRS, 2019; Jain, 2026e)
The relationship between the
official rate and inflation is an additional criticism. Statutory Revision and
variable dearness allowance may occur at differnt intervals, while market
prcies can move overnight. The lag falls on a worker who must buy at the
current Price, not on a factroy which merely follows the wage notification in
force. Employers' gains from a lag are not necessarily planned as a single
conspiracy; they occur whenever real pay loses value before the adminstrative
figure is reset. The state's refusal or failure to establish a clearly
adequate, regularly revised living standard can therefore operate as a
mechanism of wage repression through ordinary administrative time. The Phrase
'ease of doing business' has no answer to the worker whose rent is due before
the next meeting of a wage advisory body. (Drèze and Das, 2024; PRS, 2026a)
Industrial Relations Code: the
timing of refusal is transformed
Under the Industrial Relations
Code, the central threshold requiring prior permission for specified layoffs,
retrenchments and closures in particular establishments was raised from 100 to
300 wrokers; certified standing orders likewise generally moved to a 300-worker
threshold. this must be stated accurately. The code does not make all dismissal
below that number lawful, nor does it erase every requirement of notice or
compensation. Its precise and consequential change is to remove particular
prior controls and documentary obligations from establishments in the
100-to-299 range, subject to the Appropriate leagl jurisdiction and historical
state rules. From an employee's point of view the difference between govenment
approval before retrenchment and a claim for compensation after the job has
disappeared can be the difference between the Means to bargain and a creditor
knocking on the door. (PRS, 2020; PRS, 2026b)
A worker cannot exercise a
collective right in the abstract. the Code's general strike-notice regime
involves fourteen days of prior notice and restrictions around conciliation and
other proceedings. The date of an industiral stoppage is economically valuable:
a line halted immediately before a shipment creates pressure which a stoppage
long after the order has left does not. Employers have continuous power to
timetable orders, finance stock and reorganise prodcuction. Workers must
operate within the legal calendar of notification and Prohibited intervals. The
law therefore redistributes the Capacity to use time as a bargaining
instrument. It transforms spontaneity from a possible industrial response into
an object of adminstrative noncompliance. This is a material reorganisation of
conflict, effected not through a slogan but through a date entered on a notice.
(PRS, 2020; PIB, 2025; PRS, 2026b)
The recognition of negotiating
unions and councils introduces another set of calculations. the Code supplies
statutory thresholds for determining the union or council recognised to
negotiate on behalf of the recorded workforce. But in a factory with direct
employees, contractor staff, temporary workers and neighbouring supplier
establishments, the number of people who make the product may exceed the
employees counted in the relevant legal bargaining unit. One can coordinate
work across several establishments while fragmenting the leagl constituency
which is able to negotiate. The question is not wether collective
representation is given an official name. It is wether the actual workers whose
labour constitutes an industrial process are able to Bargain with the Party
controlling the process. (PRS, 2020; Thomas, 2026)
Fixed-term hiring likewise has a
definite eonomic consequence even where benefits are due during the contract.
the firm buys employmnt for a specified duration. At the end of that duration,
non-renewal need not be treated as the same legal event as retrenchment. The
worker must therefore calculate what an objection to unpaid overtime, an unsafe
target or an arbitrary supervisory decision might cost at the next renewal. The
relevant price is the expected loss of future income. A workplace can comply
with a written contractual term while using the Uncertainty of renewal to
discipline the labour which Generates its sales. this is not merely
psychological insecurity. It changes the financial outcome attached to
disagreement and therefore the practical ability to demand a wage above the
leagl floor. (PRS, 2020; Breman, 2024)
Social Security Code: the card is
not the compensation
The Social Security Code
consolidates provisions around provident funds, Insurance, gratuity, maternity
and related entitlements, while recognising gig and platform workers and
enabling further schemes. the category itself is a legal invention with material
consequences. A Person can be registred in an official database and remain
unable to purchase medicine during unemployment or claim earnngs replacement
after an injury. Recognition supplies the possibility of adminstrative
identification; it does not by itself supply the sum of money or health care
required at the moment of loss. For a temporary worker the key question is not
simply whether a social-security number exists but whether coverage survives
repeated changes of employer, city and address, and who can be compelled to
Finance the benefit. (PRS, 2020c; Ministry of Labour, 2025)
The economic defect of treating
registration as protection is that an unpaid benefit remains a household cost.
The employer may deduct or remit a contribution, the contractor holds the wage
record and an agency administers eligibility. The worker who falls ill has to
travel among the offices while losing another day of inocme. Administrative
fragmentation is a price imposed on claiming one's own rights. If the monetary
value of a benefit is uncertain, delayed or less than the costs incurred to
access it, the worker's actual insurance remains thin despite Apparently
extensive formal coverage. The state can produce the image of inclusion through
millions of registrations while risks of lost earnngs, illness and old age
continue to fall upon private savings, borrowing and unpaid family labour.
(Breman, 1996; PRS, 2020c)
Occupational safety: what changes
at a headcount boundary
The Occupational Safety, Health and
Working Conditions Code altered general factroy thresholds to twenty workers
where power is used and Forty where it is not, with separate provisions and
exceptions, including for hazardous activities; the regulation of contract
laobur is also shaped by a fifty-worker threshold. These numbers are not a map
of biological danger. The risk of a blade, chemical, unventilated floor or heat
exposure does not become less serious when the payroll count is nineteen rather
than Twenty. A statutory threshold may change registration and administrative
obligation without changing the physical process which places the worker at
risk. Where the law withdraws routine coverage or makes it harder to identify
the legal employer, it leaves bodily cost outside the price of prodcuction.
(PRS, 2020d; Government of India, 2020)
There is also a second
complication: the leagl enterprise is not necessarily the effective unit of
production. A contractor may provide workers under the direction of a principal
company's supervisors, with machinry or prodcuction rates fixed elsewhere. A
factory can be divided on paper more easily than an industiral injury can be
divided into the responsibility of two entities. If a person is injured while
meeting a target, the meaningful facts concern who Determined that target, who
controlled the equipment, who could have prevented the hazard and whose payroll
ought to carry the cost of treatment. The existence of legal categories alone
does not answer those questions. The system of classification can produce a
paradoxical invisibility: everybody knows which company is being served, yet
the injured worker must Search for the employer who can be made answerable.
(PRS, 2020d; HeatWatch and TISS, 2026)
Reading the four codes as one
economic design
The four codes must be read
together because waegs, employment duration, soical insurance and the capacity
for collective refusal determine one another. A low statutory floor depresses
the wage on offer. Fixed terms and contractors make the prospect of alternative
employment uncertain. Strike notices and recognition requirements raise the
costs of immediate collective intervention. Incomplete portability or
conditional social security makes the loss of a job financially dangerous.
Altered safety and contractor thresholds can make employers' obligations depend
on how a workforce is Administratively divided. No one provision by itself
explains the long history of stagnant wages. Together they can preserve the
eonomic conditions which prevent productivity growth from being converted into
higher remuneration. This is why a critical analysis of the Modi government's
legislative change must reach beyond the language of welfare and examine the
Production relation which the law now regulates. (PRS, 2019; PRS, 2020; PRS,
2026b)
The codes do not literally prohibit
every union or cancel every Protection, and this point is essential for
measuring what they actually do. Their political-economic significance is
subtler than blanket abolition. They redraw thresholds, timing, coverage and
leagl identities in ways which can alter bargaining capacity even without a
formal declaration that bargaining has ended. To describe such changes
precisely is to strengthen the critique, for the worker is not chiefly
concerned with wether a right continues to exist in a printed code. the worker
needs it at the moment a shift is extended, a wage is withheld or an order is
redirected and the job is to be lost. Legal effectiveness is an Eonomic
property of enforceable time. Where the right arrives only after the payroll
disappears, the law may remain formally present while its power to alter the
wage relation has been diminished. (PRS, 2020; PRS, 2026b)
PART V. NOIDA, APRIL 2026: THE COST
OF REFUSING A WAGE
A wealthy district and the
manufacture of an inadequate pay packet
The scene in Noida was produced
inside an industiral district whose public image is one of new buildings,
export capacity and expansion. A worker entering the compound in the morning
passes through gates at which machines, people and goods are sorted with
exactitude. Surendra Kashyap, an eighteen-year-old measurement checker
described in April reporting, earned roughly ₹13,000 a month, paid ₹4,000 in
rent and described a target of seventy pieces an hour. Another garment worker
described earnings near ₹16,000 and the decision to send his Daughter away
because the city could no longer be afforded by the family together. These
testimonies are particular lives rather than representative sample statistics.
Their importance is that each binds an eonomic quantity to a decision which
statistics seldom observe. Seventy pieces, thirteen thousand rupees, four
thousand in rent, a daughter living in a Different town: the output target and
the unit of family life are features of the same productive system. (Jain,
2026a; Jain, 2026e)
Gautam Buddh Nagar's contribution
to Uttar Pradesh output may be large while the workers living around Naya Gaon
cannot afford its private housing market. this is no arithmetical paradox.
District output measures the value of goods and services produced in the
district, including returns to the owners of property and captial. It is not a
ledger of what each household receives, and certainly not what it keeps after
paying the price of accommodation. the worker whose industiral contribution is
recorded in a district growth statistic may remain outside the consumption
Standards implied by the wealth of the district. The industrial estate and the
rented building belong to a single economy but to differnt owners, Creditors
and schedules of payment. (Jain, 2026e; Government of India, 2025)
The Haryana revision suddenly gave
these abstract divisions a number which could move between factories. On 9
April Haryana notified a rise of about thirty-five per cent for specified
categories, taking the reported monthly minimum for an Unskilled worker to
approximately ₹15,220. Across the state border in Uttar Pradesh the earlier
unskilled rate was reported as ₹11,313. A worker might inhabit the same
Metropolitan food-and-rent market as somebody across the border, but be
assigned a different official minimum by a state notification. Uttar Pradesh
announced an interim increase for Gautam Buddh Nagar and Ghaziabad to ₹13,690
for an unskilled worker, effective from 1 April. the figures are not estimates
of a living wage, or proof that Those sums were paid at every establishment.
They describe the administrative prcies around which an industiral conflict
came to be organised. The difference became availble to be spoken, posted,
shown on a phone and then demanded. (Hazarika, 2026; Magazine, 2026; Reuters, 2026)
A minimum wage is a peculiar sign
becuase it is at once juridical and economic. A notification printed by the
govenment is carried into the contractor's quotation, the payroll of a factory,
the bank transfer received by the employee and the budget of a room. Its
denomination remains Constant on each paper, while the amount of rice or
electricity which it purchases may change before the paper itself is revised.
At the factory gate the legally Defined worker becomes an input priced per
month, per day, per hour or sometimes per piece. At home the same person
becomes the one obliged to keep purchasing everything the employer does not
sell: sleep, shelter, transport, medicine, the means of returning next morning.
This is how a distinction internal to an accounting system acquires
Consequences in bodies. (PRS, 2019; Marx, Capital I, chs. 19–21)
From separate factory gates to a
shared industrial stoppage
The Noida mobilisation did not
begin as one union bargaining with one employer. Early demonstrations around
8–11 April developed into large confrontations on 13 April in several
industiral sectors. Workers moved among establishments, talked Across contractor
rolls and used phone messages to distribute meeting points, wage figures and
reports of what other factories were doing. The form of the movement is
significant. The labour market which holds wrokers apart by individual contract
had generated a common commodity, their Labour-power, sold across a
concentrated industrial territory. A comparison of two notified wages could
travel through the Entire industiral region much more quickly than a statutory
collective bargaining constituency could be constituted. (Reuters, 2026;
Tewari, 2026a; Jain, 2026a)
The language of efficient
production became temporarily reversible. Ordinarily the gate pass authorises
entry, the supervisor's instruction authorises the next motion and the dispatch
schedule authorises the Outgoing truck. During the stoppages a message on a
mobile phone authorised a quite differnt coordination, bringing wrokers from
several payrolls into one space. It did not render all of them politically
identical or make every forwarded claim accurate. It created, for a time, an
alternative industiral diagram: people meeting through proximity and shared
working conditions rather than through the legal name of their employer. To
call this merely the spread of an ideology misses the material channels through
which it passed, the factory Gates, roads, phones and bodies able to stop
circulation. (Tewari, 2026a; Marx, Capital I, ch. 10)
The confrontation must be recounted
without dissolving it into Either heroism or a police description of
criminality. Reports recorded stones thrown, property damaged, fires involving
vehicles and police use of tear gas. Reuters reported estimates of roughly
forty thousand participants in the wider agitation and police claims of
hundreds of arrests. Responsibility for particular acts of violence belongs to
evidence about particular people, not to the fact that a worker attended a
gathering. the fact of damage does not erase the wage grievance, just as the
reality of a wage grievance cannot establish that every action during the event
was lawful. There were plainly industiral losses as factories halted and
shipments were threatened. This is one reason the strike can change the wage
relation: it demonstrates that collectively Withdrawn laobur has a cost which a
solitary demad on the payroll does not possess. (Reuters, 2026; Jain and
Sheriff, 2026)
One can specify the economic
leverage without romanticising the crowd. A single employee's absence is a
vacancy. the sudden absence of a large number of employees in a manufacturing
cluster changes the possible date at which goods can be shipped and capital
recovered. A garment order needs a sequence of coordinated operations; the
value of the incomplete garment or stranded shipment may be far smaller to its
purchaser than the value of the finished order delivered on time. The
threatened disruption increases the cost of refusing a collective wage demad.
When law stretches out strike notices or Confines recognised bargaining to
legal establishments, it can reduce the worker's access to this moment of
leverage. The temporal detail of the code is thus also the economics of the
factroy's turnover, even Though the present argument about Marx draws its
textual account of waegs only from Volume I. (Anner, 2019; PRS, 2020; Marx,
Capital I, ch. 10)
Inspection afterwards, and the
economics of a right which could have been enforced before
The adminstrative response
disclosed another asymmetry. On 17–18 April the laobur department announced
action against 203 contractors Associated with twenty-four factories, with
notices and recovery proceedings involving approximately ₹1.16 crore in allegedly
unpaid statutory dues. These were reported official actions and allegations,
not proof that each contractor was finally held liable. Nevertheless they are a
remarkable fact about institutional capacity. Once production had stopped and
the labour dispute became a public-order crisis, the state identified files,
contractors, payments and possible penalties on a large scale. the obvious
critical question is why unpaid dues and unlawful deductions were not addressed
as a routine Condition of legitimate production before the workers were forced
onto the road. (Indian Express, 2026; Hindustan Times, 2026)
The answer cannot be that
exploitation is by definition hidden. the entries may have existed in wage
registers and contractor documnts for months. They were economically invisible
because invisibility can be made by administrative priority rather than by a
lack of recorded numbers. The govenment had the legal vocabulary of wages,
overtime and statutory benefits, but the vocabulary became active only once the
industrial flow was interrupted. The state may treat the normal continuous
dispatch of goods as evidence that the economic system is functioning, even
while the worker's pay claim remains unresolved. Once interruption occurs, the
same office can call up the files of wages previously unobserved. This is the
material semiotics of enforcement: the status of a record changes with the
Event that compels an authority to read it. (Indian Express, 2026; PRS, 2019)
A further protest on 15 April
involving women performing app-based domestic Services concerned toilets, rest
spaces, working hours and the spatial allocation of bookings. It was a separate
labour Action and must remain separate from the industiral agitation. Yet a
comparison is instructive. the platform assigns a job with a digital code,
sends a body to a customer's address, evaluates the service and can make the
worker's access to future inocme conditional on ratings. The workplace then
appears dispersed across homes, although the platform controls the timing and
allocation of the labour. Reporting six months later found some improvements in
leave and booking arrangements while serious difficulties concerning toilets
and drinking water persisted. The app's classifications govern actual bodies as
certainly as the factory's prodcuction sheets do. (Indian Express, 2026b)
Detention, wages no longer earned,
and the judicial return of the individual person
The eonomic consequences of
policing continued after the streets were reopened. An Indian Express
investigation reviewed 222 bail orders associated with seven major FIRs,
finding that bail had been granted in 188 decisions. In the report's sample of
106 arrests involving substantive Allegations, the average time in custody was
fifty-three days. These numbers concern Defined groups of cases; they are not a
census of everybody arrested and cannot be turned into a judicial verdict on
the Entire demonstration. They nevertheless document a form of loss usually
excluded from an account of wage stagnation: days for which a person cannot
earn at all, even when an eventual court decision allows release. (Jain and
Sheriff, 2026; Roy, 2026)
Fifty-three days is a sum of unpaid
rent instalments, missed earnngs, borrowed cash, interest and future
obligations. the loss is cumulative because an employer need not preserve a
place at work until the Accused returns. The family that obtained a loan to pay
legal expenses cannot repay it by presenting an order of bail to the factory.
Here repression becomes economic without needing to be disguised as an economic
law. A policing decision can terminate labour inocme, transfer costs to
households, create debt and change the expected price of attending the next
protest. Such consequences modify the bargaining position of wrokers who were
never themselves arrested, because they can anticipate the risks of
participation. The distinction between the market explanation and the soical
enforcement of wages is maintained, yet the two now operate together. (Jain,
2026; Breman, 1996)
The record of Akriti Chaudhary
offers a sharper leagl Determination. In a judgment of 2 September 2026, the
Allahabad High Court quashed the National Security Act detention imposed upon
her in the aftermath of the Noida agitation. the judgment described the
controversy arising from widespread demands by labourers receiving low pay,
working long shifts and facing rising prcies; it found the challenged detention
without sufficient grounds and contrary to the constitutional right to liberty.
This establishes the fate of the Particular detention Order. It is not a
general acquittal of every person charged in the unrest. Its importance for the
present paper is the difference between the criminal state's aggregation of a
crowd into a suspected danger and the court's requirement to consdier
particular acts, reasons and evidence. (Allahabad High Court, 2026)
Police allegations about organising
included references to WhatsApp groups, QR codes, books on Marx, maps and
soical-media messages. ThePrint reported how such Objects entered the
chargesheet as evidence for theories of coordinated mobilisation. the objects
have no intrinsic criminal meaning. A map can be an instrument of organising,
Research, recruitment or Ordinary navigation. A book can be read without
turning its reader into a conspirator. What a police file does is to insert
these objects into a new chain of legally consequential signs. A digital
message which enabled a worker to attend a meeting is now asked to signify
guilt. The question of evidence is wether the particular claim made about the
object can be demonstrated, not wether the object has an intellectually
suspicious name. (Tewari, 2026; Allahabad High Court, 2026)
PART VI. THE CURRENCY, THE
CORPORATION AND THE ORDER-WORD: A COMPARATIVE HISTORY OF FASCIST LABOUR
November 1923: when a monetary body
could no longer hold its signs
There are variables of content, or
proportions in the interminglings or aggregations of bodies, and there are
variables of expression, factors internal to enunciation. Germany, toward
November 20, 1923: on the one hand, the deterritorializing inflation of the
monetary body and, on the other, in response to the inflation, a semiotic
transformation of the reichsmark into the rentenmark, making possible a
reterritorialization.- Deleuze and Guattari 'A Thousand Plateaus'
The most exact place to approach
the problem of fascist material semiosis is, strangely, ten years before Hitler
came to power. A passage under the title 'November 20, 1923: Postulates of
Linguistics' distinguishes variables of content, the shifting proportions in
'interminglings or aggregations of bodies', and variables of expression
internal to enunciation. It then names the German inflation of 1923 and the
transformation of the currency as a simultaneous movement of the monetary body
and its signs. This is a valuable method of looking at eonomic history: one
should not ask what a sign says about an independently given Eonomic Substance;
one should ask what the altered sign makes possible within the transactions
constituting that substance. ('Postulates of Linguistics', 1987;
Bundesarchiv, 1923; Deutsches Historisches Museum, 2015)
In the months of hyperinflation
money continued to possess figures, numerals and official denominations even as
its ability to secure goods collapsed. A wage could be paid as a mountain of
paper without remaining an effective claim upon Bread. A price could be
accurate at one moment and useless later the same day. The sign of monetary
equivalence had not become simply untrue in the way a sentence about the
Weather might be untrue. Its practical capacity to mediate exchanges, settle
debts and coordinate future transactions was disintegrating. Wages, bank
deposits and prcies ceased to furnish the ordinary calendar by which households
purchased and stored commodities. The inflationary process was a disturbance in
the very relation between a sign and the circulation of bodies, and not merely
in the meanings attached to German national identity. (Bundestag, 2023; ECB,
2008)
The Rentenmark was issued beginning
15 November 1923 after the Rentenbank had been established in October. It was
associated with mortgage claims on agricultural and commercial property, a
restricted suply of the new money and a stabilisation policy in which the new
unit became accepted in actual payments. One Rentenmark stood for a very large
quantity of the old paper money. The re-denomination alone was not Magic.
Limits on money creation, fiscal measures, changes in expectations and the
institutional backing of the currency mattered. The new note worked insofar as
sellers, purchasers, offices and banks accepted it as an effective claim.
Material content and monetary expression had been reorganised Together. A newly
printed sign permitted a new sequence of acts: a wage received, an invoice
settled, a loaf purchased, an order placed.
This is the point of the abstract
machine. It is neither an invisible spirit in language nor a synonym for
ideology. It is the diagram according to which a written denomination meets a
bank rule, a commodity, a debt and a body prepared to transact. ('Postulates of
Linguistics', 1987; Sohn-Rethel, 1978)
But 1923 was not yet Nazi Germany,
and the Rentenmark reform was carried out under the Weimar Republic. It did not
make fascism inevitable. Germany experienced additional Crises, most decisively
the collapse of employmnt and credit following 1929, alongside a specific
political history of organised anti-socialism, militarism, racism and attacks
on the parliamentary Republic. The lesson of the monetary passage is therefore
methodological rather than a false direct causal chain from hyperinflation to
the camps. It shows how a crisis in the capacity of an eonomic sign to command
trust and transactions can be followed by the formation of new institutions,
new authority and new rules of collective action. One must then ask which
political forces take command of those institutions. (Bundestag, 2023; USHMM,
n.d.)
Italy, 1926–27: the factory as a
corporation of a national body
The historical legislation of
Fascist Italy offers a more direct comparison to labour-law rearrangement. the
law of 3 April 1926 regulated collective laobur relations through officially
recognised bodies and prohibited strikes and lockouts. The Carta del Lavoro of
21 April 1927 declared productive activity a national unit and work a soical
duty under the authority of the state. The corporate arrangement sought to
place employers and wrokers within recognised categories Whose legitimate voice
passed through institutions accepted by the Fascist state. Independent class
conflict was to be displaced by representation within a Supposedly unified
national production. Industrial antagonism did not disappear. Its capacity to
take the form of autonomous collective refusal was altered in law.
The material operation is unusually
precise. To declare one legally recognised association the voice of an
occupation is to make an entire category of wrokers appear before the state
through an authorised mouth. A factory's refusal of a wage demand becomes a
question for the Official corporation or labour magistracy, rather than an
occasion for Workers to stop the factory themselves. The abstraction 'National
prodctivity' becomes a principle for deciding whose interruption counts as an
injury to the social whole. Bodies continue stitching, milling, farming and
transporting; expression is reassembled in legally monopolised channels. The
nation is made to speak as one eonomic body exactly where its divisions of
ownership and income have not ceased.
This is where the comparison with
India's codes has genuine explanatory force, even though the constitutional and
historical orders Differ. the Indian Industrial Relations Code has not outlawed
all independent unions or replaced them with a single Fascist corporation. Yet
it too makes the power of collective action depend more acutely on official
classifications of employmnt, the recorded membership of a bargaining body and
the times at which a stoppage is permitted. India's legal changes can be
criticised for diminishing wrokers' effective leverage without inventing a
formal abolition of unions which did not occur. The common analytical problem
is a state project which presents controlled industiral order as a universal
interest and relocates conflict into procedures designed around the continuity
of production. The scope and coercive Totality of the Italian dictatorship
remain distinct historical facts, not reasons to abstain from comparison.
Nazi Germany, 1933–34: the
destruction of independent labour representation
After Hitler's accession to power
the Nazi state destroyed independent trade unions in May 1933, confiscated
their institutional autonomy and channelled employmnt relations through the
German Labour Front and state-appointed Authorities. the 1934 law regulating
national labour, documented in contemporary diplomatic reporting, recast
factroy relations in an explicitly hierarchical language of the leader of the
enterprise and its following, while trustees of labour exercised wide powers
over conditions, wage regulations and the Purported maintenance of industrial
peace. The factroy was reorganised as an authoritarian political Organism. The
worker ceased to be represented through an independent association with a
legitimate right to industiral conflict. (USHMM, n.d.; US Department of State,
1934)
The change took place not only in
coercive apparatuses but Inside the vocabulary used for prodcuction. The
'leader' of the enterprise and the 'following' of employees were not Decorative
metaphors in a propaganda poster. They entered institutional rules, Authority
relationships and the organization of grievances. They told people which
instructions came from where, who could petition whom, and whose act
constituted disobedience. In this way a word carried a whole diagram of eonomic
command. A machine operator might continue to use the same lathe, but the
possible relationships among operator, management, collective organisation and
state had been transformed. The linguistic alteration was a material change in
the conditions of laobur. (US Department of State, 1934; USHMM, n.d.)
The Nazi invocation of the national
community also made racial exclusion part of the industiral order. Jewish
wrokers and other persecuted People were progressively deprived of rights and
livelihood through anti-Jewish laws and coercion; the Regime's vast system of
forced laobur emerged in relation to dictatorship, war and racial ideology.
This cannot be treated as the generic destiny of a low-wage market. It was the
result of particular racist doctrines, institutions of terror and an
expansionist state. Nevertheless it demonstrates with terrible clarity that the
classification of a person in the state register can decide not only
remuneration but whether that person's body is entitled to work, to move, or
finally to live. Fascist semiosis is not a benign metaphor for a complicated
sign system; it is the Practical conversion of names, classifications and
commands into differentiated forms of human exposure. (USHMM, n.d.)
Any rigorous comparison with the
Modi govenment's reforms must therefore name both the object of comparison and
its limit. There is no credible case for declaring that the Industrial
Relations Code is identical in legal content to the Nazi abolition of unions,
or that an Indian minimum-wage notification is equivalent to Nazi racial law.
There is a Stronger and more disturbing claim available: the Subordination of
worker organisation to an authorised industrial timetable, the fragmentation of
who can speak for labour and the political treatment of disruption as a danger
to national Eonomic order belong to a family of techniques with authoritarian
historical precedents. Modern leagl democracies can use some of these
techniques without having reproduced a totalitarian regime. Criticism of the
codes is strengthened by identifying exactly which techniques are present and
whose power they alter. (PRS, 2020; US Department of State, 1934)
The semiotics of fascism is the
arrangement, not the opinion
It is tempting to account for
fascism by discovering a set of Convictions in someone's head. There is
historical evidence for doctrines of race, nation, hierarchy and obedience, and
one must not suppress that evidence. But the thought experiment posed by
industiral and monetary abstraction asks how a doctrine becomes a functioning
apparatus. A salute is a muscular sequence whose Public form distinguishes
bodies. A membership card grants one route into an assembly and denies another.
A national prodcuction figure can be made to outweigh the time lost by an
injured person. A loudspeaker repeats a command until unrelated Individuals
stand, march or raise a hand together. Political organisation exists here as
linked movements of matter and signs, not merely as a collection of beliefs
with which the masses privately agree. (USHMM, n.d.; 'Postulates of
Linguistics', 1987)
The new relation between content
and expression can be shown by following the change in a worker's designation.
Under one arrangement she is an employee who belongs to a union and can
interrupt production with others. Under another she is a temporary hire whose
contract ends before a grievance is decided. Under a dictatorial arrangement
she may be a member of a compulsory national labour organisation, called upon
to obey in the name of the whole. The material body can be the same person; the
effective powers and obligations of that body are different becuase the
institutional statement has changed. That change is neither 'mere language' nor
an independent eonomic force replacing wages and factories. It takes effect
Through documents, payrolls, physical controls, courts, and the risk of being
prevented from earning. this is an abstract machine in the most literal sense
available: a diagram whose abstraction is accomplished by actual bodies. (Marx,
Capital I, chs. 19–21; PRS, 2020; US Department of State, 1934)
One should not misread the word
'fascism' as a synonym for every efficient system of classification. A economic
euqation possesses technical vocabulary and a logistics company uses schedules;
neither thereby constitutes a fascist state. the critical transition Occurs
when an order of prodcuction or national identity claims the authority to
cancel autonomous political association, assign dissent to a suspect Category
and enforce hierarchical unity through state power. The value of the semiotic
perspective is that it makes those decisions observable before a fully
articulated ideology is repeated by an indvidual. It asks us to follow an order
from the state circular to the payroll to the gate, from the broadcast to the
march, from a leagl category to its consequence in a person's movements. The
wage story and the fascist story meet in this question of how relations which
appear Abstract acquire power over bodies; the historical regimes must still be
distinguished with exact care. (Carta del Lavoro, 1927; USHMM, n.d.)
PART VII. THE PRICE OF CONTINUITY:
CONCLUSION
The economic answer to wage
stagnation now has a determinate shape. Firms buy labour according to the
demand for what labour produces; captial-intensive investment can increase
output faster than it increases paid hours; international buyers can determine
a selling price which squeezes suppliers; concentrated hiring and Costly job
searches can give employers wage-setting power; the income produced may flow
toward returns on capital instead of wages; and living costs can outrun nominal
revisions. These processes have been observed at different scales and with
differnt evidence. Their relative contribution in Noida can be measured only by
opening the books of establishments and examining prcies, paid hours,
employment histories and household expenditure. That is an economic programme
of inquiry and a critique of the idea that unrestricted Market competition must
translate industrial growth into a decent wage. (Abraham and Sasikumar, 2017;
Anner, 2019; Manning, 2003; ILO–IHD, 2024)
Marx's Volume I locates these
findings within an account of laobur-power as a commodity, the division of the
working day, machinery, time Wages, piece waegs and accumulation. Breman
describes the mobile population whose interrupted livelihoods make those
economic relations durable in India. The Patnaiks extend the argument toward
the international organization of cheap commodities and constrained peripheral
purchasing power. Chakrabarty reminds us that the Person who brings
labour-power to the gate also brings histories which capital needs but cannot
wholly manufacture according to its own logic. Their explanations do different
jobs. No amount of quotation from any one can replace identifying the specific
mechanisms by which a wage is set, the volume of labour employed, or the prices
of what a wage can buy. (Marx, Capital I; Breman, 1996; Patnaik and Patnaik,
2016; Chakrabarty, 2000)
The Modi govenment's legislative
transformation has made the distinction between a right printed in law and a
right enforceable during production more urgent. It has regrouped twenty-nine
central statutes into four codes whose effects are concentrated at very
concrete points: the minimum rate, the definition of an establishment, the
counting of wrokers, the contractual term, the time when a strike may legally
begin, the benefits obtained during injury and the forms through which a worker
is Recognised. This is an exercise of state power over the conditions of
bargaining. It is critically inadequate to celebrate the formal existence of a
wage floor when the worker must still threaten to stop prodcuction before
Unpaid sums receive enforcement attention. (Ministry of Labour and Employment,
2025; PRS, 2020; Indian Express, 2026)
In Germany in 1923 a change of
currency denomination belonged to the difficult restoration of exchange; in
Nazi Germany a decade later the state destroyed autonomous trade-union life,
while Italian Fascism subordinated the employment relation to the officially
recognised corporate order. These were not successive moments of one necessary
chain. Taken together they make visible that numbers, denominations,
institutions and commands are material signs: they organise the coordination of
what people can do. The Noida wage notification performed a differnt operation,
making a new official sum available for bargaining, while factroy ledgers and
police classifications shaped what wrokers might earn and what could be done to
them for objecting. The same analytical language can describe Their operational
form without declaring Their politics identical. ('Postulates of Linguistics',
1987; Bundestag, 2023; Carta del Lavoro, 1927; USHMM, n.d.)
The garment worker leaving a
factory has alreay inhabited several economies by the end of the day. One has
priced her hour, one has set the price of the exported garment, another has
charged for the room she occupies, and another has assigned a cost to the
journey home. The law has assigned her one category at the gate and perhaps
another in the contractor's ledger. A wage which does not rise is therefore no
small failure at the margins of national growth. It discloses the possibility
that an expanding industrial order may repeatedly purchase productive laobur
Without furnishing the people who perform it the conditions for an ordinary
life. The factory runs; its commodity leaves; the family has to make itself
available for tomorrow. The apparent continuity of industiral Capitalism is
purchased, in part, by the discontinuity of wrokers' income, rest, residence
and ability to refuse. That is what the Noida protests made visible, and what
any account of India's new labour settlement must answer. (Jain, 2026e; ILO–IHD,
2024; Marx, Capital I)
REFERENCES
Anner, mark S. 2019. ‘Predatory
Purchasing Practices in Global Apparel Supply Chains and the employment
relations squeeze in the Indian Garment Export Industry’. International Labour
Review 158(4): 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12149
US Department of State. 1934.
Germany: embassy dispatch, 'Law for the ordering of National Labour' and
Trustees of Labour. Foreign Relations of the United States, vol. II.
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1934v02/d217
Marx, Karl. Capital, Volume ONE.
Part II chapter 6; Part III working Day; Part IV machinery and relative surplus
value; Part VI chapters 19–22 wages; Part VII accumulation.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf
Hazarika, Abhimanyu. 2026. ‘New
labour codes not in our interest’: Workers in Gurgaon respond to Haryana's
revised minimum. Indian Express, 14 april.
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/haryana-minimum-wage-hike-protest-gurgaon-labour-codes-10635945/
International Labour Organization
and Institute for Human Development. 2024. India Employment report 2024: Youth
Employment, Education and Skills. Figure 2.8 and the tables on real earnings.
https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2024-08/India%20Employment%20-%20web_8%20April.pdf
Allahabad High Court. 2026. Akriti
Chaudhary (Detenue) v. Union of india and Others, Habeas Corpus Writ Petition
no. 960 of 2026, judgment 2 September. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/134187496/
Breman, Jan. 1996. Footloose
Labour: working in India's Informal Economy. Cambridge University Press.
https://books.google.com/books/about/Footloose_Labour.html?id=vDV7Y1cnQawC
Ministry of Labour and Employment.
2025. Four Labour Codes made effective from 21 November 2025; rationalisation
of 29 central Laws.
https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2192463&lang=1®=3
Basole, Amit and amay Narayan.
2020. ‘Long-run performance of the organised manufacturing Sector in India: An
Analysis of Sub-periods and industry-level Trends’. Economic and Political
Weekly 55(10): 35–44. https://publications.azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/2258/
Jain, Drishti and Kaunain Sheriff
M. 2026. Noida factory workers in jail 53 days on average, 222 bail orders and
188 grants. Indian Express, August.
https://indianexpress.com/article/express-exclusive/noida-workers-jailed-for-53-days-on-average-then-courts-stepped-in-10840972/
Patnaik, Utsa and Prabhat patnaik.
2016. A Theory of Imperialism. Columbia University Press.
https://cup.columbia.edu/book/a-theory-of-imperialism/9780231179799/
Carta del Lavoro. 1927. The Italian
Fascist charter of labour, enacted 21 april 1927, full text.
https://mjp.univ-perp.fr/constit/it1927.htm
Abraham, Vinoj and S. K. Sasikumar.
2017. Declining Wage Share in India's Organized Manufacturing Sector: Trends,
Patterns and determinants. ILO Asia-Pacific working paper series.
https://www.ilo.org/publications/declining-wage-share-india%E2%80%99s-organized-manufacturing-sector-trends-patterns
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000.
Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical difference.
Princeton University Press, especially 'The Two Histories of Capital'.
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691130019/provincializing-europe
Manning, Alan. 2003. ‘The Real Thin
Theory: Monopsony in modern Labour Markets’. Labour Economics 10(2): 105–131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(03)00018-6
PRS Legislative Research. 2020.
Issues for Consideration: Industrial relations, Social Security and
Occupational Safety codes, 2020.
https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/bills_parliament/2020/Issues%20for%20Consideration%20-%20Labour%20Codes%202020_0.pdf
Somanathan, E., Rohini Somanathan,
Anant Sudarshan and Meenu Tewari. 2021. ‘The Impact of Temperature on
Productivity and Labour Supply: Evidence From Indian manufacturing’. Journal of
Political Economy 129(6). https://doi.org/10.1086/713733
Treccani. 1932. Fascismo,
historical encyclopedia entry on the Law of 3 April 1926, officially recognised
unions and the ban on strikes.
https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/fascismo_%28Enciclopedia-Italiana%29/
Reuters. 2026. ‘India's Uttar
Pradesh state raises workers' wages amid protests over pay’, 14 April.
https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/indias-uttar-pradesh-state-raises-workers-wages-amid-protests-over-pay-2026-04-14/
Tewari, Samridhi. 2026b. ‘Books on
Marx, Facebook posts, village Maps: police's evidence trail in Noida workers'
protest case’. ThePrint, 3 July.
https://theprint.in/india/books-on-marx-facebook-posts-village-maps-polices-evidence-trail-in-noida-workers-protest-case/2976762/
Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. 1978.
Intellectual and Manual Labour: a Critique of epistemology. Macmillan.
https://archive.org/search?query=Alfred+Sohn-Rethel+Intellectual+and+Manual+Labour
PRS Legislative Research. 2026.
Code on Wages (Central) Rules: review noting that criteria for minimum wages
were left to a later order.
https://prsindia.org/billtrack/prs-products/rules-and-regulations-review-1782811294
HeatWatch and Tata Institute of
Social Sciences. 2026. Breaking Point: Heat and the Garment Floor, worker
surveys and factory case studies.
https://www.heatwatch.in/blogs/new-report-breaking-point-heat-and-the-garment-floor
Bundestag. 2023. Hyperinflation in
Deutschland 1923, monetary stabilisation and the fiscal cuts.
https://www.bundestag.de/parlament/geschichte/100-jahre-weimar/hyperinflation-970722
Tewari, Samridhi. 2026a. Noida
police cite WhatsApp groups and QR Codes after the wage protests. ThePrint,
April 14.
https://theprint.in/india/noida-police-cite-whatsapp-groups-qr-codes-to-allege-gang-orchestrated-wage-hike-protest/2904852/
Economic Survey 2024–25. Ministry
of Finance, government of India, employment chapter and PLFS earnings.
https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/economicsurvey/
United States Holocaust Memorial
Museum. n.d. ‘Gleichschaltung: Coordinating the Nazi State’, destruction of
independent German unions and creation of DAF.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/gleichschaltung-coordinating-the-nazi-state
Indian Express. 2026. Noida
administration initiates action against 203 contractors and Rs 1.16 crore dues,
18 April.
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/gautam-buddha-nagar-administration-on-workers-protest-10642677/
International Labour Organization.
2017. Declining wage share in India's organised Manufacturing. Research
overview.
https://researchrepository.ilo.org/esploro/outputs/encyclopediaEntry/Declining-wage-share-in-Indias-organized/995219323302676
Postulates of Linguistics. 1987.
‘November 20, 1923’ chapter in A Thousand Plateaus, English edition.
https://azinelibrary.org/approved/1000Plateaus.pdf
Ministry of Statistics and
Programme Implementation. 2026. Annual Survey of Industries, 2024–25 results;
output, emoluments and total employment, 30 September.
https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2316981&lang=1®=3
Deutscher Bundestag. 2023. Currency
reform in the Weimar Republic, a note on labour and civil-service reductions.
https://www.bundestag.de/parlament/geschichte/100-jahre-weimar/hyperinflation-970722
PRS Legislative Research. 2026.
Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Bill: repeal dates and links to the old
Labour acts.
https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-industrial-relations-code-amendment-bill-2026
Jain, Drishti. 2026. ‘For jailed
Noida workers, cost of poori subzi is 53 days in jail, lifetime of fear, debt’.
The Indian express, Aug 20.
https://indianexpress.com/article/express-exclusive/bail-offers-cold-comfort-noida-workers-face-debt-fear-what-if-police-pick-him-up-again-10840974/
Indian Express. 2026b. ‘They
protested for toilets: Six months on, Noida gig workers still struggle’,
October 16.
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/noida-women-gig-workers-protest-washrooms-fixed-hours-10922747/
Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. 1987. The
Economy and Class Structure of German Fascism. Free Association books.
https://books.google.com/books?q=The+Economy+and+Class+Structure+of+German+Fascism+Sohn+Rethel
European Central Bank. 2008. German
1923 hyperinflation and the monetary constitution.
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2008/html/sp080620_1.de.html
Jain, Drishti. 2026e. Noida garment
workers' rented rooms and family separation, field reporting. Indian Express
April.
https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/rising-costs-stagnating-wages-why-workers-are-protesting-in-india-10636950/
Magazine, Aanchal. 2026. ‘Rising
costs, stagnating wages: Why workers are protesting in India’. Indian Express,
16 April.
https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/rising-costs-stagnating-wages-why-workers-are-protesting-in-india-10636950/
CEDA, Ashoka University. 2026. On
the factory floor, off the payroll: Contract work in formal manufacturing.
https://ceda.ashoka.edu.in/on-the-factory-floor-off-the-payroll-contract-work-in-formal-manufacturing/
Nathan, Dev, S. Rahul, Lakshmi
Bhatia, Rekha Chakravarthi and Pradeepan Ravi. 2024. Global Monopsony,
Contracting Practices and Labour Outcomes: A Study of Garment GVCs in India.
Indian Journal of Labour Economics 67(4): 993–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-024-00546-w
Ghosal, Sutanuka. 2026. Cannot
absorb hike in wages: Noida exporters. Economic Times, 16 April.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/cannot-absorb-hike-in-wages-noida-exporters/articleshow/130292606.cms
Seth, Maulshree. 2026. After
massive worker protests in Noida, UP govt hikes minimum wage rates. Indian
Express, 14 April.
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/lucknow/noida-ghaziabad-workers-to-get-higher-pay-up-govt-hikes-rates-after-massive-protests-10635209/
Breman, Jan. 2024. The Contrasting
Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post-colonial India. Development and Change
55(4): 533–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12845
Das, Arindam and Jean Drèze. 2024.
The problem of India's stagnant real wages. Ideas for India.
https://www.ideasforindia.in/profile/jean
Jain, Drishti. 2026a. My salary
increased by Rs 39 last year: Noida garment workers, contractors and survival.
Indian Express, 13 April.
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/salary-increased-rs-39-last-year-noidas-angry-garment-workers-10633835/
Jain, Drishti. 2026e. What future
can we build on Rs 9,000? Workers in Noida, housing, garment production. Indian
Express, 20 April.
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/delhi-hardlook-wages-survival-the-story-behind-plight-of-workers-in-noida-10645709/
Ministry of Statistics and
Programme Implementation. 2025. Time Use Survey 2024: domestic work and
economic activity. https://mospi.gov.in/
PRS Legislative Research. 2020c.
Code on Social Security, 2020: key features and gaps.
https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-code-on-social-security-2020
Government of India. 2020. The four
consolidated labour codes, texts and central rules.
https://meglc.gov.in/labour_codes.html
A detailed consideration about the Indian labour codes and the labour protests of 2026 in the National Capital Territory of India in light of what Karl Marx explained about the massive contribution of a worker which is very minimally rewarded with the producer taking away the bulk of the profits produced. The loss of effectiveness of the earlier labour laws for Unions and protests and the ineffectiveness of protest with the promulgation of the four labour codes is very effectively brought out. Above all the human angle of the worker's struggle to survive and the vice-like grip of capitalism and fascist tendencies, which prevent such struggle comes through very clearly. An excellent article which calls for publication in academic journals as well as a simplified version for general reading.
ReplyDelete